In recent years, the medical community has dramatically increased its focus on the genetic underpinnings of complex neonatal conditions, among which Small for Gestational Age (SGA) infants stand out due to their heightened risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. New research underscores the intricacies of the genetic landscape contributing to SGA, revealing a multifaceted etiology that stretches far beyond previously recognized environmental and placental factors. This detailed evaluation emphasizes a paradigm shift toward comprehensive genomic sequencing as a valuable diagnostic tool, potentially transforming care for the most vulnerable neonates.
Small for Gestational Age infants—defined typically as those whose birthweight falls below the 10th percentile for their gestational age—represent a heterogeneous group with variable etiologies and prognoses. Historically, clinical investigations have focused on maternal health, placental function, and external environmental influences such as nutrition and exposure to toxins. Although these factors are undeniably significant, emerging data paint a more nuanced picture, indicating that genetic aberrations may underlie a substantial fraction of SGA cases. Despite this, the degree to which genetic disorders contribute to fetal growth restriction and SGA remains inadequately elucidated.
To address this knowledge gap, a comprehensive literature synthesis of genomic sequencing in SGA and fetal growth restriction was conducted, illuminating the complex genetic architecture of these conditions. An extensive catalog of 161 single-gene disorders linked to impaired fetal growth was identified, highlighting the remarkable heterogeneity of genetic causes. Notably, of this expansive gene pool, the ten most commonly implicated genes accounted for only about one-third of cases, whereas an astounding 50% were attributable to unique, less frequently observed genes. This pattern underscores the remarkable genetic diversity that clinicians and researchers must navigate in diagnosing and managing SGA.
.adsslot_0IymqQ4Fbs{width:728px !important;height:90px !important;}
@media(max-width:1199px){ .adsslot_0IymqQ4Fbs{width:468px !important;height:60px !important;}
}
@media(max-width:767px){ .adsslot_0IymqQ4Fbs{width:320px !important;height:50px !important;}
}
ADVERTISEMENT
Among the well-characterized syndromic causes of SGA are Silver-Russell Syndrome and Noonan Syndrome, both of which involve distinct genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications that manifest as pronounced growth restriction. Silver-Russell Syndrome, for instance, is often caused by hypomethylation of the imprinting center 1 on chromosome 11p15 or maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7, leading to disrupted growth factor expression. Noonan Syndrome arises from mutations in genes such as PTPN11, which affect the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway, resulting in multisystem developmental anomalies including reduced fetal growth. These syndromes exemplify how pinpointing precise genetic alterations can inform prognosis and guide treatment strategies.
An intriguing aspect emerging from recent genetic analyses is the notable association between genetic causes of SGA and the frequent co-occurrence of congenital anomalies. Skeletal dysplasia, a group of disorders affecting bone growth and development, frequently appears alongside growth restriction genetically driven by mutations in genes regulating cartilage and bone formation. Furthermore, developmental delays often accompany these congenital anomalies, suggesting broader systemic involvement. These findings reinforce the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach that integrates genetic diagnostics with detailed phenotypic characterization to provide optimal care.
Despite the mounting evidence supporting the role of genetics in SGA, existing clinical guidelines for genetic evaluation in these infants remain surprisingly limited. Routine use of exome or whole-genome sequencing has not yet been widely adopted in neonatal or perinatal practice, largely due to cost, accessibility, and interpretative challenges. However, given the substantial proportion of infants in whom a diagnosable monogenic cause exists, adopting genomic sequencing could revolutionize early diagnosis, allowing earlier intervention, targeted therapies, and appropriate genetic counseling for families.
The potential benefits of early genetic diagnosis are far-reaching. Identifying precise mutations can not only clarify the etiology of growth restriction but also forecast associated complications, inform surveillance for comorbid conditions, and influence therapeutic decisions. For example, in cases where growth restriction is part of a broader syndromic condition amenable to specific treatments or monitoring strategies, genomic insights become indispensable. Moreover, genetic diagnosis empowers clinicians to counsel parents regarding recurrence risks and tailor perinatal care accordingly.
Such advancements in genomic medicine necessitate a shift in both clinical practice and research priorities. Existing retrospective studies offer valuable insights, yet prospective genomic studies of SGA infants are urgently needed to delineate the full spectrum of genetic contributions systematically. Large-scale, longitudinal investigations incorporating multi-omics approaches alongside detailed phenotyping will illuminate genotype-phenotype correlations, refine variant pathogenicity assessments, and optimize diagnostic yield. These initiatives hold promise not only to enhance our understanding of SGA but also to improve neonatal outcomes through precise, individualized care.
The heterogeneity of genetic findings in SGA also challenges the field to develop and refine bioinformatics tools that can effectively prioritize variants of uncertain significance. With half of diagnosed cases linked to a unique gene, reliance on established gene panels alone may be insufficient. Innovations in variant interpretation, functional validation assays, and collaborative data-sharing consortia are imperative to harness the full power of genomic technologies in this context. These efforts will also facilitate the identification of novel disease genes and pathways involved in fetal growth regulation.
An expanded genetic perspective complements ongoing research into the molecular mechanisms governing placental function and nutrient transfer, both critical determinants of fetal growth. It is increasingly clear that genetic disorders impacting growth factor signaling, metabolism, and tissue development intersect with placental insufficiency, compounding growth restriction. Hence, a comprehensive evaluation of SGA infants must integrate genomic data with placental pathophysiology and maternal-fetal interactions to unravel the complex etiological web.
In practical terms, integrating genomic testing into neonatal care pathways requires addressing logistical, ethical, and counseling challenges. Timely sample acquisition, data analysis turnaround, and interpretation demand streamlined workflows and skilled personnel. Parent and family education about the implications of genetic findings, potential incidental discoveries, and reproductive options remain crucial components of care. Sensitivity in communication coupled with multidisciplinary collaboration among neonatologists, geneticists, and counselors enhances outcomes and family satisfaction.
The rapid evolution of sequencing technologies coupled with decreasing costs will likely accelerate the adoption of genomic testing in the neonatal setting. Emerging methods such as rapid exome and genome sequencing offer the possibility of delivering actionable results within days, a transformative prospect for critically ill infants presenting with unexplained growth deficits and associated anomalies. These advancements herald an era where genetic clarity guides not only diagnosis but also therapeutic innovation in neonatal medicine.
Furthermore, the implications of genetic findings extend beyond the neonatal period, illuminating pathways underlying long-term complications faced by SGA survivors. These infants are predisposed to metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, and neurodevelopmental impairments across the lifespan. Understanding how specific genetic mutations influence these trajectories enables the development of personalized follow-up strategies designed to mitigate long-term risks and improve quality of life.
In conclusion, the burgeoning evidence delineating the significant genetic basis of SGA underscores the urgent need to incorporate comprehensive genomic testing into routine evaluation. This holistic approach promises to clarify the enigmatic origins of growth restriction, facilitate precise diagnoses, and catalyze individualized therapeutic and counseling strategies. As the field advances, sustained investment in prospective studies and infrastructure will be paramount to unlocking the full potential of genomics in transforming neonatal care for Small for Gestational Age infants.
Subject of Research: Genetic testing and its role in diagnosing and managing Small for Gestational Age infants
Article Title: The role of genetic testing in small for gestational age infants
Article References:
Kalimi, E., Zhao, E., Wise-Oringer, B. et al. The role of genetic testing in small for gestational age infants. J Perinatol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02343-9
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02343-9
Tags: advancements in neonatal genetic researchcomprehensive genomic analysis in pediatricsenvironmental influences on neonatal growthetiologies of small for gestational agegenetic disorders in fetal developmentgenetic testing for small gestational age infantsgenomic sequencing in neonatal careimpact of genetics on fetal growth restrictionmaternal health and SGA infantsneonatal conditions and genetic factorsSGA infants and perinatal morbidityunderstanding small for gestational age prognosis
